Science

Some calculations on single-wall carbon nanotubes

Francisco Torrens

Institut Universitari de Ciència Molecular, Universitat de València

Dr. Moliner 50, E‑46100 Burjassot (València), Spain

Francisco.Torrens@uv.es

 

The aqueous solubility Sw of C60-70-82, van der Waals dimerš (C60)2 and chemically reduced C60H60 is calculated with our program based on AQUAFAC model. C60-Ih has a especially symmetric truncated-icosahedral structure. C70-D5h is similar to C60, with the 10 extraš atoms inserted in a band of hexagons around the middle of the truncated icosahedron, producing a prolate, ellipsoidal structure. A substructure of C70, where the five non‑equivalent atoms are labelled a-e, shows that atoms a-dš join one pentagon with two hexagons, while atom eš joins three hexagons. Some endohedralš C60H60 isomers with one or more C-H bonds pointing inside the cavity result more stable than their all-outš counterparts. The calculations refer to AM1 optimum number of inside H atoms and geometry, which has 10 endohedral H atoms. The negative Gibbs free energy of solvation in water -DGsolv,water slightly increases from C60-82. However, -DGsolv,1‑octanol increases from C60-82. 1‑Octanol-, cyclohexane- and chloroform-water partition coefficients (Po, Pch and Pcf) increase by seven orders of magnitude with the number of atoms. For (C60)2-C5h, it is considered the possibility that the aqueous phase be entirely assigned to the monomer. C60H60 results show that no important effect on logPš is expected related to the all-exoš (Ih) or partially endoš (C1) position of H atoms. A comparative study is carried out with programs SCAP and CDHI (logPo), and SCAP and a method by Leo and Hansch (logPch-cf). LogPo-ch-cf allow calculating molecular lipophilicity patterns, which show that, for a given atom, normalized logPo-ch-cf are sensitive to the presence in the molecule of other atoms-groups, e.g., C70, where logPa-c atomic contributions are greater than logPd-e are, what can be explained because the distances from the nearest pentagon vary gradually from aš to e. By contrast, CDHI does not differentiate atoms a-e. The molecular lipophilicity pattern (MLP) is the 10´normalized logPo map of C70. Lipophilicity monotonically decreases as the distance from the nearest pentagon increases. LogPo correlates quadratically with the distance from the nearest pentagon. For single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNT) of chiral (lattice) indices (n,m), logSw and logPo-ch-cf correlate with (n2 + nm + m2)1/2, which is proportional to SWNT diameter. (10,10), the most favourite SWNT, presents consistency between a relatively small aqueous solubility and great Po-ch-cf. The partition of SCAP logPš for (17,0)-(10,10) shows that the contribution of the trivalent atoms aš is smaller that that of the divalent atoms bš is. However, CDHI does not differentiate atoms a-b. (17,0)-(10,10) MLPs show that divalent atoms bš present the greatest lipophilicity. Although the solubility in organic solvents is predicted greater than in water, absolute solubility in organic solvents is estimated extremely small, which is supported by the fact that there are few solvents for SWNTs. SWNT solubility is studied in various solvents, finding a class of non‑H‑bonding Lewis bases with good solubility. Solvents group in three classes. Although a Lewis basicity without H‑donors was suggested experimentally to be an important condition for a good solvent, this may be a necessary but not sufficient condition since DMSO, a bad solvent, is an exception. Poly(a,4‑benzyl), 1,2,3,4‑tetramethylbenzene (TMB), 1,2,3,5‑TMB, 1,2,4,5‑TMB and poly(1,2,4,5‑TMB) (PTMB) behave as class 2. PTMB is an ultrastrong solvent of C60 (at least 10 times stronger than the best known solvents). SWNTs in some organic solvents are positively charged, while in water-Triton X are negative. CycloD‑Glcpn are less hydrophilic than D‑Glcpn are. CycloD‑Glcpn lipophilicity shows that hydrophobic effect is important in D‑Glcpn-inclusion complexes with hydrophobic guests.

 




[Contents]

homeKazanUniversitywhat's newsearchlevel upfeedback

© 1995-2008 Kazan State University