View from KSU
Federal Research University
M.Kh.Salakhov
Kazan State University
18, Kremlyovskaya Str., Kazan, 420008, Russia
rector@ksu.ru
The idea of federal research university and its criteria, special
structure and education as well as the problem of management and legal rules
was a question for discussion in academic circles in the middle of the 1990s.
That was an attempt to find one of the ways for education and science
modernization in conditions of changes of the Russian society and transmission
to new political and economical relations. In the process of the discussion the
idea of a research university was linked with the idea of the "leading
university", and it was clear why such things happened. In highly developed
countries, where the term "a research university", connected with researches
and education, is widely used, elite universities represent themselves first of
all as research ones, where education is closely connected with scientific
investigations within a broad ramified multi-level system of communications.
It is significant that in the USA, where formalized
criteria, known as "Carnegie classification", are used for gradation of
higher-educational institutions, the highest of six categories, usually
universities and colleges are divided into, coincides with a research
university (1). In Japan, the country of advanced technologies, there are 700
universities, but only 70 of them have the official national status. The most
important determinant of being in the "premier league" is pronounced and
effective research work, which results in notable achievements. In our country
by the way, classical universities, both the oldest ones and those founded in
the XX century, play the similar role in the system of education, and the high
level of their educational process is based on scientific, first of all
fundamental and searching, investigations.
Although
in the 1990s the institutions responsible for scientific-and-technological
development failed to coordinate their positions on realizing the idea of a
research university, the idea itself was being in use among experts,
administration of higher education establishments, scientists and lecturers. A
new impulse for the concept promotion to the sphere of investigations was
conveyed by Research-and-Educational Centers in a number of leading
universities of Russia established on the basis of the contest program, which
had been worked out by the American Civil Rights Development Foundation (CRDF)
together with our administrative educational institutions.
The
program greatly concerns Kazan University, one of the leading classical cites
of learning in Russia. The university has won grants for creation of a
Research-and-Educational Center (REC). REC-007 "Materials and Technologies of
the XXI Century" formed in KSU, is to train highly professional specialists of
quite a new type, able to solve problems of high technologies in
closely-related fields of physics and chemistry, biology and material studies.
REC was organized on the basis of the faculties of physics and chemistry of the
Kazan State University owing to wide integration of the Kazan Scientific Center
institutes of the Russian Academy of Sciences including Institute of Organic
and Physical Chemistry, Kazan Physical Technology Institute, Kazan Institute of
Biophysics and Biology as well as the university departments of Microbiology
and Applied Mathematics.
Finally
the newly established Ministry of Education and Science of Russia, aimed at
integration of science and education, raised
a question of a research university as a form of close interaction between
universities, academic research institutes and state scientific centers as one
of the ways for solving the problems of the research-and-educational reform
being realized in the country. Modernization of the intellectual sphere, which
implies both science and the system of education, is a pressing need of the
time. Nowadays one realizes clearly, that a serious drawback of the Russian
system of higher education and scientific investigations is their
disconnection, which became an obstacle to further building up the intellectual
potential of the country.
Intellectual
sphere of Russia includes about three thousand institutions and design offices.
Among them there are 460 scientific institutions belonging to different
sections and regional branches of Russian Academy of Sciences, six state
academies and also almost 7 million lecturers and students. While in the USSR
there were 190 students per 10,000 people at present there are about 300
students in Russia, but the export of industrial innovations is
only 6%. According to the following figures the decline in intellectual
potential is the most disturbing. In 1989 the intellectual potential index in
the USSR was 0,71, coming to 0,47 in 1997
and being less than 0,4 at
the beginning of this century. The tendency is quite obvious.
Financial
problems including those of university science are certainly the first reason
one pays attention to. Only 38% of all higher institutions have funds for investigations
and only one fifth of the lecturers are involved in research work. But this
serious question is not the only one. The situation with scientific
investigations and developments was not changed greatly by increased expenses
on science of the last years. During the period from 1990 to 2004 financing was
four times as much, i.e. more than 46 milliard rubles by the beginning of this
year (2005). At present science financing is a priority line as there is a
schedule of budget allocations extension approved by the government. Their
relative growth outruns not only inflation but also the expansion of budget
expenses. Unfortunately money is often spent irrationally.
It
is clear, that main problems are caused not only by poor financing, but also by
the necessity of better organizing of the science-and-education system. The
practice shows, that scientific output is proportional only to the logarithm of
financial resources allocations and
directly proportional to effective science organizing. Nowadays the task,
connected with development of effective scientific policy and mechanisms of its
realization is of primary importance. Specialists in science studies pay their
attention to the role of the state system and significance of its actions for
scientific sphere, as there is no effective demand for science unlike other
spheres of social life and culture. Even in the USA, the country of highly developed science-intensive
production, expenses for fundamental and major applied researches are an
exclusive obligation of the state. Some of our scientists and publicists
complain of the fact, that only 6% of all science-and-technological
developments in Russia are carried out by private companies, while the main
volume of such developments are based on private capital in the developed
countries. However, they don't take into account that private industrial
capital in the world countries and in the USA in our case, finances mainly
applied researches and development activity, while spending twice more money
than the federal budget for research and development.
Modernization
of science and education in order to provide knowledge economy in Russia, which
brings in from 40% to 70% of increase in the national income in every developed
country, is a mutual process. It demands concerted actions of both the academic
sector of science and the system of science and education. Certainly, these
tasks can be performed only on the basis of consistent and weighted policy. It
should define the aims and main principles, time and mechanisms of
modernization of intellectual sphere in order to save and develop a competitive
system of knowledge reproduction as a precondition for development acceleration
of economy and society. The priority task of the state policy is to get rid of
artificial organizational and legal barriers between fundamental science and
education, the two systems, which are a single whole. The existence of such
barriers poses an obstacle for using results of fundamental research in
education, and on the other hand, prevents young specialists and university
scientists from doing scientific researches.
At
present the idea of a "research university" blends with further integration of
science and higher education, establishment and support of integrated
structures of science and education, university and interuniversity complexes,
research-and-production centers, search and introduction of optimal integration
forms for academic sector of science with the leading Russian universities. Now
the outlines of science-and-education integration are becoming obvious. The
forms of such integration will be partner departments of leading universities
in academic higher education establishments, research universities or
university science-and-research centers, special laboratories or students' design offices. Taking into account the
significance of the research university project for modernization of science
and education, it is sensible to get down to its origin and compare its
principles and idea with the character and level of "your" university. It is
obvious, that the concept of a "research university" is a big problem,
connected with the character of development as a type of educational
establishment and special social practice. Properly speaking, the Humboldt idea
of classical university of the New Time, which replaced the image of a medieval
university (theological or scholastic university), was based on the integration
of educational process and fundamental scientific researches. In a sense it is
the very idea of a research university, which main functions are knowledge
production, their accumulation and storage, knowledge transmission and
distribution. Main principles of the university are academic freedom, priority
attention to the development of scientific investigations and training of elite
researchers.
Further
development of European universities was based on these principles. Nowadays,
in conditions of the global market and information society, they apply to a new
method of university organizing, which meets the requirements of the time. Such
a university is often called an "entrepreneur's" one, emphasizing a special
role, played by greater diversity of financial resources and the development of
all-embracing entrepreneur culture connected with the latter. The new European
"entrepreneur" and "innovative" establishment is the very type of a research
university, adapted to the conditions of up-to-date technologies and labor
market, which is proved by the main characteristic features of a contemporary
European university. They are multi-level education, fundamental and applied
scientific investigations, as well as solution of regional economic and
socio-cultural problems.
Although
the University of a New Type as a research one firstly appeared in Europe, the
research universities have been mostly developed across the Ocean. By the year
of 2000 there were about 260 similar educational establishments in the USA,
while 70 in Germany, 73 in Great Britain (including 30 polytechnic schools of
university status), 41 in Spain, etc. Traditions of the research university in
the United States were established by B. Franklin, the outstanding politician,
scientist and enlightener, who founded the University of Pennsylvania and was
one of the first honorary members of the St. Petersburg Academy of Science.
Having his own scientific and educational experience, he paid his attention to
the fact, that science and education enrich and give energy to each other.
Nowadays there are universities in many American states, which provide the main
cash inflow to local budget, connected with new technologies. According to the
data given at the Russian-American Conference "Research Universities" in April
2004 in the Presidium of Academy of Science Russia, the state support of
researches in the universities of the USA is growing from year to year. Partly
it also concerns Russian universities. Since 1992 the total sum of the USA
government support to Russian science and education exceeded 500 million
dollars; 130 partnership projects were realized.
Meanwhile
the situation with our education and science became different from that of the
North-Atlantic countries for a few historical reasons. As we know, one of the
peculiarities of Enlightenment, beginning with the epoch of Peter I implied
separation of science and education. However, one shouldn't exaggerate the
scale of enlightenment of that time. The outstanding authoritative physician
Pirogov, who supervised scientists' training in Russia, wrote that as for
science "there were no differences between academy and university. Those, who
were in the avant-garde of science, taught students. Education was adapted to
science, but not to teaching". More over, there was a single hierarchic system
of educated class from a university graduate to academician. It was quite
natural that at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries a term close in meaning to a
"research university" appeared in Russia. The question is about the so-called
"Russian method of training engineers", notable for a deep theoretical studying
of engineer projects.
It
is significant, that professors of the Kazan University, the first in Russian
province, had contacts with the biggest scientific societies of Europe, such as
Astronomy and Asian societies in Paris, the Royal Society in London, Academy of
Sciences in Berlin, Brussels, Lisbon and other cities. These deep-rooted
research traditions of the Kazan University continued to support fundamental
science during the Soviet period, when the development of a university sector
of science faced both pecuniary and juridical difficulties. Even in severe
conditions of the Great Patriotic war the university authorities and its staff
tried to maintain it as a classical educational establishment, distinguished by
scientific investigation and scientific education. In 1943 professors N. G. Chetayev
and B. A. Arbuzov were elected to the "big" Academy. A geologist Ye. I.
Tikhvinskaya was the first woman of the university who got Doctor's degree. In
1944 Ye. K. Zavoisky opened the phenomenon of electronic paramagnetic
resonance. Other scientific schools were developed at the university.
War
in general gives paradoxically strong impulses to the development of science
and technology, also because of concomitant recombination of scientific
structures and forces. Many academic institutions, evacuated from Moscow and
Leningrad to Kazan in 1941, turned our city into a unique place of active
interaction of "academic" and "university" science and its intensive
integration with educational process.
As a
matter of fact, the organizational model formed de facto, was a basis for relations of our university with a
regional branch of the Academy of Sciences of Russia established in Kazan. Its
first leader was Alexander Arbuzov, professor of Kazan State University, who
never lost contact with this cite of learning. The leading university
scientists K. M. Mushtari, L. M. Miropolsky, N. L. Livanov, M. Kh. Gainullin
and A. A. Trufanov headed the branch departments and the Presidium. A single
whole of "university" and "academic" science was also demonstrated by scientific work of Boris Arbuzov,
N.G.Chebotaryov, Ye.K.Zavoisky, G.S.Vozdvizhensky, P.M.Tikhonov and many
others.
KSU links with academic institutes of the Kazan
Scientific Center became an integral part of science and education in our city
and republic. One can mention the treaty on scientific and technological
cooperation between KSU and the Kazan Branch of Academy of Sciences. Signed in
1987, it played a positive role in increased efficiency of scientific
researches and drew the Academy scientists in training highly professional
specialists. Forms of KSU interaction with the Regional (Kazan) Academic
Center, now headed by academician A. I. Konovalov, the rector of Kazan
University from 1979 to 1990, are different. KSU and KSC participate together
in the Federal Purpose-Oriented Program "Integration of Science and Higher
Education in Russia" as well as in the work of "Educational and Scientific
Center for Training Highly Qualified Specialists on Priority Scientific Trends,
Developed by the Leading Schools of KSU and KSC". The results of scientific
collaboration demonstrate advantages of cooperative work within "Kazan
Educational and Scientific Center of Natural Sciences". KSU partner
departments, opened at academic institutes, have been working fruitfully. Among
them there are the departments of supra-molecular chemistry, chemical physics
and physical-and-chemical biology. In their turn the leading scientists of KSC
head a number of the university departments. Laboratories and equipments of
academy institutes are widely used in the educational process. More than 50 KSC
staff members give lectures to undergraduates and graduates and more than 100
students are studied at partner departments. But all mentioned above doesn't
exhaust the principles and character of interaction of scientific and
educational systems in our city and the republic.
Thus,
the historical experience of Kazan University proves the idea of a famous
researcher V. A. Pokrovsky, who specializes in organizing science and
education. Speaking about the problem of research universities, he said:
"Juridical term a "research university" doesn't exist in Russia. But in fact
there are several big universities in Russia, doing for the definition. Among them there are the Moscow State
University named after M. V. Lomonosov, St. Petersburg University, Moscow
Institute of Physics and Technology, Kazan University and others. Each of them
has a few research institutes and closely collaborates with them" (2).
Actually
those forms of contemporary integration of science and education are getting
rights, which have already been accepted as tendencies in MSU, St. Petersburg,
Kazan, Rostov, Novosibirsk Academic Campus and other scientific and educational
centers. But it wouldn't be quite correct to exaggerate the scale of science
and education integration even in those not numerous scientific and educational
centers where such processes were rather strong, including without any doubt
the city of Kazan and Kazan University. The experience of the last decades when
the idea of university was strongly altered could not disappear completely. In
higher education the accent was put on a narrow specialization according to
models of the "system of artificial stability" used in the XIX century.
Creation of special higher educational establishments was mainly based on
destruction of infrastructure of classical universities and even the necessity
of university education was called in question.
With
the beginning of a "reversed" reorganization of university in our country under
the influence of economic and social demands, one couldn't come back to a
completely research type of university. More over, the state support of
fundamental scientific researches was mainly realized through the system of
academies of sciences, but its interaction with the system of universities was
quite limited. It became a drag on the way of scientific and technological,
social and cultural development of Russia, being especially obvious in
conditions of society and economy transmission. It is also clear that Russian
universities don't have rich experience in strategic planning of their
activity, which is usual for European research (innovative) universities. As a
matter of fact it is a business plan, which implies certain resources, their
order and measures for achieving the goals of university development. Meanwhile
it is the contemporary research university, which is able to blend with the new
organizational and economic conditions, can be a worthy partner in the
integration process of science and education.
The
criteria system of federal research university developed by scientists and
specialists from the Tomsk State University is worth speaking about. In 2004
the all-Russia seminar titled "Federal Research University. Working out the
Criteria and Legal Rules" was held there. Except Tomsk University the seminar
organizers were a Ministry and National Center for Specialists' Training.
Choosing
the main criteria of the federal research university scientists assumed as a
basis the term "criterion", which has two interconnected meanings: 1) a
characteristic feature, which is the basis for assessment, the definition or
classification of something; 2) measure of assessment.
In
this sense a general criterion assessment of the federal research university at
the first stage implies the choice of characteristic features. Then a certain
system of indexes is formed. They can be formalized, expressed in numbers, or
can get a qualitative (or expert) assessment. The developers of the system
explain that numerical parameters depend on outer conditions, such as the
expected number of such universities, size of financing, etc.
The
problem of a research university, worked out by scientists form Tomsk, is based
on the analysis of the purpose-oriented program "Integration" accepted in the region,
aimed at stimulating collaboration between academic institutes and higher
education establishments. The Tomsk University and a number of academic
research institutes developed the project of "Academic University"
scientific-and-educational center. This project, which has been realizing since
the second half of the 1990s, was included in the "Integration" program
mentioned above. A peculiarity of the Tomsk scientific-and-research center is
the fact that academic structures initially appeared on the basis of the
leading schools of higher education and fundamental science and in their turn
greatly influenced the trends and principles of specialists training later on.
New departments of the Tomsk Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences
(Siberian Branch) were opened at the university after academic institutes had
been established or during this process. Now the departments have branches at
the academic institutes. Short-term tasks of the "Academic University" project
included organizing and supporting the historically formed system of
interaction between academic institutions of Siberian Branches of Russian
Academy of Sciences and Russian Medical Academy of Sciences and the Tomsk State
University. Long-term tasks of the project consisted in putting into practice
the model of stable system interaction between academic institutes and Tomsk
University, directed towards common scientific researches and training elite
scientists, lecturers and technologists.
Thirteen
centers for fundamental researches and elite education were established within
the "Academic University" in order to solve the problems of science development
and training specialists of the highest qualification. Owing to the established
centers not institutions (subdivisions), but scientific and educational schools
were integrated, i.e. the integration, figuratively speaking, has not a
"bureaucratic" but "creatively rich and substantial" character. "Academic
University" had to solve the problems, which more or less concerned other
scientific-and-educational centers, i. e. to oppose progressive deterioration
of pupils' knowledge of physics, mathematics and natural science. That was a
reason for applying to forms and methods of early training and career guidance
of school-leavers, represented as a system of pre-university education. It goes
without saying that in this case the main result of the "Academic University"
project implementation is the development of organizationally stable system of
interaction between university and academic institutes.
Ideas
of up-to-date integration of science and education are implemented in St.
Petersburg, where Academic Physical Technology University of Russian Academy of
Sciences was founded on the basis of A. F. Ioffe Physical Technology Institute.
Integration processes are going on in the Western Siberia. From the very
beginning it was close collaboration between the Novosibirsk State University
and institutes of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Science. The process is
going on. The birthday of the Research Educational Center for Humanities and
Social Sciences was celebrated in early spring of 2005. Being an independent
legal entity, the center got an official approval as a research university.
Scientific councils of academic institutes of Psychology, Philosophy, and
Sociology, as well as the Institute of the USA and Canada and others are united
with the councils of the REC for Humanities and Social Science departments,
which are situated on their territory. Graduate and postgraduate studies, which
imply getting the bachelor's and master's degrees and the system of
post-university education are also united. It is one of the possible ways of
integration as students are taught at the research centers.
Another,
perhaps, even more promising way for the development of a research university
with educational and research components combined has been experienced in
countries of the West. The ratio between them, for instance, in the USA is 60 to 40 in researches favor. In
general the Kazan University is leveled at this model, supporting the idea of a
research university in a present situation. In spring 2005 a round-table
discussion, dedicated to the problem of a research university in the system of
contemporary Russian education, was held within the "Open University: Kazan,
2004-2005" project, developed by the Strategic Research Center of the Volga
Federal District together with Kazan State University. The university officials
and scientists from different departments, faculties and structural
subdivisions took part in the discussion as experts, who had a deep knowledge
of the problem.
Speaking
about the professional attitude to the idea of a research university,
participants of the round table came to conclusion that every country has its
own specific structures within the model of a research university. For example,
the so-called schools of research pupils have been established in the USA.
Perhaps, we should use something from their experience. For instance, we may
introduce the status of a "research student" for talented persons really
involved in scientific process. It will promote not only younger generation
upbringing but also personality socialization.
In Germany, for example, they form institutes of student leaders (the so-called
groups of "rector's reserve"). There is an opinion that a research university
stimulates the most important quality of student's personality, encouraging
critical self-reflecting thinking.
Nevertheless,
the discussion revealed troubles of scientists and specialists, who deal with
future realizing the idea of a research university, as only 2,85 milliard
rubles are given for all university science every year. It is less than the sum
budgeted for financing the Novosibirsk Center of Russian Academy of Sciences.
The question under discussion, which stirs various circles of university
representatives, concerns risks and expectations connected with participation
of the Russian system of higher education in the Bologna process. According to
the requirements of the Bologna movement post graduate studies should pay more
attention to education, while in our country an acute problem for a
post-graduate student is to write a qualification paper in time.
In
whole the analysis of the Kazan University situation proves that it answers the
major criteria of a research university. KSU includes 17 faculties, 4
institutes, branches in Zelenodolsk and Naberezhnye Chelny cities, a number of
auxiliary units (preliminary department, educational center of additional
studies and so on) and general departments. More than 17000 students are
studying at the university. Research departments and educational centers are
represented by two research institutes (N. G. Chebotaryov Mechanics and
Mathematics Institute and Butlerov Institute of Chemistry). Besides, the
research-and-educational structure of Kazan University includes the Botanic
Garden, a big number of research laboratories, techno-park, Astronomic
Observatory named after V. P. Engelhard, Observatory in Turkey, etc. The
information support is provided by a unique academic library named after N. I.
Lobachevsky, which enumerates about 5 million units, Internet Center and rich
computing machinery centers. The KSU
structure also implies socially-oriented departments and public organizations.
In particular there are 7 museums, a publishing center, center of investments
and innovations and so on.
Students
and graduates are intensively involved in research work. A lot is being done to
develop a system of open or postal tuition (the university course first of all,
but also pre- and post university studies), based on the up-to-date information
technologies. Multimedia complexes on different subjects are developed for
different educational establishments to provide information methods of
correspondence training. The advanced learning in KSU implies post graduate
studies in 77 specialties and PhD graduate school in 11 specialties; there are
21 scientific councils for getting Doctor of Science degree and 7 scientific
councils for getting Candidate of Science degree on 39 specialties. Research
work in the KSU is being done on 421 subjects within 40 scientific trends.
KSU
has international contacts with more than 40 universities from 20 countries all
over the world. Such partnership implies joint research projects, traineeship,
and exchange of professors, scientists, post-graduates and students. The
average number of foreign grants and projects of KSU comes to 40-45 with total
financing of about $ 2,000,000. The major part of this money is spent on
academic mobility of the staff members and approximately 20% go towards
equipment, books and expendable materials.
One
of the characteristic features of a research university is integration of
researches and educational process on all levels of training (university
course, graduate and post-graduate
studies, PhD graduate school, retraining, and advanced traineeship) and
infrastructure of advanced training (by the way, this items are the main
criteria of a research university suggested by specialists including those from
Tomsk). KSU also provides an integral education in natural sciences and
humanities: a pedagogical traineeship for mathematics, a new candidate exam on
Philosophy and History of Science, newly introduced course of Innovations
Management and so on, but there is a lot of work to do to set a harmonious
system.
Nowadays
taking into account foreign models and being guided by our own traditions it
would be advisable to concentrate on three interconnected types of activity,
namely educational, scientific and innovative, while developing the structure
of a federal research university. When speaking about the key principles of a
research university, one should emphasize a special value of effective business
connections and commercialization of research output, implemented in circum-university
space as well as creation of open
educational space (i.e. integration of science and education) on the regional
level.
Understanding the idea of a research university in
such a way one can conventionally subdivide its structure into two parts -
educational-and-research departments and research-and-production departments of
innovative character. In their turn the establishment of
educational-and-research innovation complex on the basis of the university
presupposes that the university structure will also include regionally
significant research institutes, commercial educational centers, research-and
production enterprises, and other organizations. All their property partly or
completely will belong to a higher educational establishment and the process of
education is attended by researches, technological design, financing, and
production.
In
whole a research university can be represented as a vertically integrated
research-and-educational unit, which is formed on the basis if a classical
university with new distinctive features: multi-subject character; wide
system-based involvement of students in researches; applied/innovative
character of investigations. Traditional Russian educational and research
departments, such as faculties, faculty-institutes, research institutes,
problem laboratories, educational-and-research centers and others should be the
basis of the educational-and-research innovative complexes. The novelty here is
greatly stipulated by a new kind of interaction of these structures with each
other alongside outer and interuniversity innovative units. As for the purely
educational structures it is a question of their course program renewal.
Research departments are to change the direction of investigations and
development activity.
Proceeding form the fact that a research university is
inevitably based on establishment of research institutes integrated for
education, a few years ago we began to experiment with this model on the
chemical sector of KSU. The faculty of chemistry and Butlerov Chemical Research
Institute were united as a single institute-department. At present, although
preliminarily, one can mention positive results of this step. We have some
ideas how to use the approaches of this model to intensify the effectiveness of
a mathematic disciplines series at the university. We suppose that if
scientists and lecturers understand that one can rely on "additional non-linear
effects", speaking in scientific terms, one can work in the direction with much
confidence, thus, strengthening positions of our university as the core of an
integrated REC of future
© 1995-2008 Kazan State University