Launchers will suitably celebrate their fiftieth anniversary in 2007, but they are still considered to be the "protozoa" among all flying. The rocket means of ascent - a product of sophisticated scientifically human work - are outward in heir development at a level of a butterfly, which hatched its posterity, sorry - ascended a satellite and died. This dialectic wrench could be put down to the paradoxes of development of sophisticated technique, if the utilitarian side didn't influence the development of launchers: most of the launchers has military predecessors. The philosophy of short living of military technique left its indelible mark over them.

Even on conservative railways the change of technical generations is going faster. So why then in such a "hitch" field of human work as space there is no hitch in its backward branch, that is, - in means of ascent. What's the matter? This research gives the system analysis in considered domain.