Integrated design of an
aircraft guidance system using feed-back linearization G.Bertoni, N.Bertozzi, P.Castaldi, M.E.Penati M.Bonfè, S.Simani ENDIF, An innovative
technique for integrated design of aircraft guidance system using Feed-back
Linearization technique is discussed. Numerical results using a Piper PA-30
nonlinear mathematical model are given in a various range of flight situations.
The integrated approach is expected to be characterized by a good flexibility
about trajectories, aircrafts and autopilots used, significant precise
performances, and capability of rejection atmosphere disturbances and faults on
command surfaces. 1. Introduction To day, in
almost every field of engineering technology, a great development of automatic
procedures and capabilities is observed. A great boost to the development of
fully automated flights, have come, since the last 10 years, from the diffusion
of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in military operations and some civil ones.
The aim of this effort is to enable a precise trajectory tracking in a complex
and full of disturbances ambient such as the free atmosphere. The great freedom
about available trajectories granted by free airspace contrast with the strict
request of accuracy in the positioning system and precise tracking due to
safety procedures, so that both the guidance and the control system requests
should be, at the same time, characterized by good flexibility and high
performances, which implies a deep level of specialization. Therefore there is
a higher request of interaction between the definition of the guidance
calculations and the mathematical model of the aircraft dynamics, in order to
accomplish the requirements. In this paper we want to investigate the
possibility of using the Feed-back Linearization (FL) technique (see Isidori,
1995) in order to design an integrated guidance system for an aircraft flying on
a desired trajectory. The application of FL to nonlinear systems requires the
design of a nonlinear control law such that the closed loop of the original
nonlinear plant with the controller becomes exactly equivalent to a linear
system. The nonlinear control law will be named hereafter dynamic compensator.
This block calculates a control action that applied to the nonlinear plant will
make it produce an output in linear relationship with the reference input that
we may call pseudo-input, of the dynamic compensator itself. The results
obtained by the use of FL to design a guidance system are twofold: first,
dynamic compensator automatically generates the correct kinematic input in
order to perform the desired trajectory; second, it makes the global system linear,
thus much simpler to control. On the other hand, the FL technique is difficult
to apply directly on the full mathematical model of an aircraft; since there
are several mathematical constrains that may not be satisfied by a detailed
dynamic model of such a complex system. Moreover, even if FL may be applied to
a slightly simplified model, the dynamic compensator may result any way
computationally costly for on-board computer control systems, especially
considering small UAVs. To avoid these problems and also to reduce costs and
computational efforts, the proposed linearization procedure done on a simple kinematic
model, this is actually valid, under some assumptions, for any possible
aircraft. It must be denoted that the resulting dynamic compensator can be
successfully applied to the real airplane model thanks the interactive role of
autopilots, as will be described with more details in the rest of the paper (Section
3). This paper presents thus an approach for the application of Feed-back
Linearization on a six degrees of freedom nonlinear aircraft model and analyses
the performances of the interaction on a complex three-dimensional trajectory.
It is important to remark that numerical results have been obtained considering
a full nonlinear mathematical model, complete with measurements noise and wind
gusts, during the simulation, even if the FL linearization technique has been
applied, as will be described in next section, to a simple kinematic model.
Therefore, the results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach
even for practical application on real aircrafts. 5. Conclusions The results
obtained during the four numerical tests shown in the paper confirm the
capabilities of the guidance system proposed. The integration of Feed-back
Linearization technique on a six-degree of freedom aircraft has been managed
through the trick of using autopilots in order to make the airplane close to a
unicycle model. The combination of basic mathematical tools leads however to a
system characterized by high-level features: flexibility in trajectories and
performances requests, rejection of atmospheric disturbances and command
surface faults and good tracking accuracy; all together in a low cost architecture. References 1.
Isidori. Nonlinear Control
Systems, 3rd Edition, 1995, Springer-Verlag. 2.
De Luca, G.Oriolo. Modelling
and Control of Non-holonomic Mechanical Systems. In Kinematics and Dynamics of
Multi-Body Systems, J. Angeles, A.Kecskemethy Eds., CISM Courses and Lectures No.
360, 1995, Springer-Verlag, Wien, pp. 277-342. 3.
G.Oriolo, A.De Luca,
M.Vendittelli. WMR control via dynamic feed-back linearization: Design,
implementation and experimental validation. IEEE Transactions on Control
Systems Technology, vol. 10, No. 6, 2002, pp. 835-852. 4.
d'Andrea-Novel, G.Bastin, G.Campion. Control of
nonholonomic wheeled mobile robots by state feed-back
linearization. Int. J.Robot. Res., vol. 14, No. 6, 1995, pp. 543-559. 5.
M.Bonfè, P.Castaldi,
V.Geri, S.Simani. Fault detection and isolation for on-board sensor of a
general aviatiom aircraft. International journal of adaptive control and signal
processing, No. 20 issue 8, 2006, pp. 381-408. 6.
S.Sastry. Non linear systems:
analysis, stability and control. Chap 8-9, Springer Verlag, 1999. Gianni Bertoni, Dr., Prof. He graduated in electronic engineering at the Paolo Castaldi, Dr., Prof. He received the "Laurea'' degree (cum laude) in Electronic Engineering
in 1990 from the University of Bologna and the Ph.D degree in System
Engineering in 1994 from the University of Bologna, Padova and Firenze. Since
1995 he has been Associate Researcher at the Department of Electronics,
Computer Science and Systems of the Marcello Bonfe', Dr.
He received the M.Sc. in Electronic Engineering from the Nicola Bertozzi, Dipl. Maria
Elisabetta Penati, Dr.
Maria Elisabetta Penati graduated magna cum laude in electronic engineering at
the Silvio Simani, Dr., Prof. He received the
"Laurea" degree (cum laude) in Electrical Engineering in June 1996 from the
Department of Engineering at the |
© 1995-2008 Kazan State University